Kel-Tec PF‑9 Reviews and Purchase

by | Sep 2, 2010 | Gear, General, Guns & Weapons, Personal, suburban survival, Urban Survival | 5 comments

I just pur­chased myself a Kel-Tec PF‑9.  I’m replac­ing a Bersa Thun­der .380 as a C.C. weapon, and I have been sali­vat­ing over this gun since I saw the below review by Nut­n­fan­cy on YouTube.  Nut­n­fan­cy has a great review process that will walk you through the advan­tages and dis­ad­van­tages of just about any weapon you are look­ing to pro­cure.  High­ly rec­om­mend his YouTube Chan­nel.

This was a hard gun to find.  First, they are very pop­u­lar.  Sec­ond, they are very inex­pen­sive, by com­par­i­son to their cousins of the same size and cal­iber.  Third, it is the right weight, size, and thick­ness for con­cealed car­ry, and it seems to be for a lot of oth­ers as well. Four, it helps me to stan­dard­ize on ammu­ni­tion, as now I have two 9mm Luger guns.  I will prob­a­bly sell my Bersa Thun­der so that I do not have an “extra” gun lay­ing around, or maybe I should keep it as an emer­gency back­up…

See the com­pre­hen­sive reviews below to learn more about this pop­u­lar gun for con­cealed car­ry and self defense.

I’ll post more on it after I take it to the range myself.  My review won’t be quite as com­pre­hen­sive as Nut­n­fan­cy’s but I’ll let you know what I per­son­al­ly think of it.  Until then…

Kel-Tec PF‑9: “Dai­ly Car­ry Hand­gun” Pt 1 by Nut­n­fan­cy

Kel-Tec PF‑9: “Daily Carry Handgun” Pt 2 by Nutnfancy

Kel-Tec PF‑9: Shooting Impressions

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
468

You may also like

5 Comments

  1. Suburban Survivalist
    Suburban Survivalist on September 3, 2010 at 7:41 pm

    I picked up a Kel-Tec P3AT. Light, accurage enough, and very small. Kel-Tec has some good prod­ucts.

    Reply
    • suburban
      suburban on September 5, 2010 at 2:17 pm

      This is my first Kel-Tec, and am hap­py with the pur­chase. It is a lit­tle short­er and much thin­ner than my Bersa, and seems com­fort­able to car­ry so far.

      Reply
  2. Nobody
    Nobody on September 9, 2010 at 9:27 am

    Got a P‑11 sev­er­al years ago and I’m always think­ing about trad­ing it for the PF‑9. Still, 11 rounds is nice to have and its not too big either.

    Reply
    • suburban
      suburban on September 9, 2010 at 9:37 am

      Good point… I looked at the P‑11. Just did­n’t appeal to me and the weight is a con­sid­er­a­tion to me as well…

      Reply
  3. Nobody
    Nobody on September 12, 2010 at 9:55 am

    P‑11 is def­i­nite­ly a bulki­er pack­age, but at the time it was a good choice and not too expen­sive. I’d say the pf‑9 would be the way to go today though.

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *